The debate on the design of the Lokpal has been premised on the questionable assumption that what is needed to combat corruption is a powerful national institution to prosecute and convict the corrupt, but the debate has not drawn on the experience with the existing institutional models, namely the Lokayuktas in the states. An empirical analysis of the performance of the Lokayukta in Karnataka between 1995 and 2011 suggests that any anti-corruption agency, no matter how powerful, that is oriented towards criminal conviction is bound to fail in the absence of judicial reforms.
Access the piece here.
Cite:
Sudhir Krishnaswamy, A Narayana and Vikas Kumar, Lok Pal Bill: Lesson’s from Karnataka Lokayukta’s Performance (EPW, 07th January 2012)